Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2000 MT 308 - State v. Hill

State v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
January 2021
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently January 2021 · most notably State v. Bar-Jonah (2004), State v. Pittman (2005)

26 state decisions

170200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Ake v. Oklahoma · State v. Moore · State v. Miller · State v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) The defendant or the prosecution may move for a change of place of trial on the ground that there exists in the county in which the charge is pending such prejudice that a fair trial cannot be had in the county. (2) If the District Court determines that there exists in the county in which the prosecution is pending such prejudice that a fair trial cannot be had, the District Court shall: (a) transfer the cause to any other county in which a fair trial may be had; (b) direct that a jury be selected in any county where a fair trial may be had and then returned to the county where the prosecution is pending to try the case; or (c) take any other action designed to ensure that a fair trial may be had.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is largely a factual determination that is within the discretion of the district court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re Sms

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.