Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2000 ND 110 - Crumley v. State

Crumley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2021

7 state decisions

30200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Owens v. State · Murchison v. State · Gierke v. Gierke · State v. McClean · State v. DeCoteau

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An applicant for post-conviction relief is only 'entitled to an evidentiary hearing if a reasonable inference raises a genuine issue of material fact.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is not an abuse of discretion for the trial court to refuse to appoint counsel when the application for relief is completely without merit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.