Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2000 ND 29 - State v. Koble

State v. Koble’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2020
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2020

8 state decisions

50200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. One Black 1989 Cadillac VIN 1G6DW51Y8KR722027 · State v. Serr · Gabriel v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty · United States v. $87493800 US Currency · A & H Services, Inc. v. City of Wahpeton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the case of forfeitable property seized and held as evidence of the commission of a criminal offense, .the court in which a criminal prosecution was commenced may issue its order, upon motion and after hearing unless waived, for disposition of the property in accordance with this chapter.... Although no separate forfeiture proceeding is required to be instituted under this section, all other provisions of this chapter apply to proceedings commenced pursuant to this section.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Issues not adequately raised below will not be addressed on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.