Berg v. Berg’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently January 2020 · most notably Prchal v. Prchal (2011), Sall v. Sall (2011)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Moilan v. Moilan · Flattum-Riemers v. Flattum-Riemers · Berg v. Berg · Millang v. Hahn · Evans v. Backes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A district court abuses its discretion when it acts in `an arbitrary, unreasonable, or unconscionable manner, or when it misinterprets or misapplies the law.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[i]f we are unable to determine whether the court considered and resolved a critical issue, particularly when conflicting evidence has been presented, remand is necessary to afford the court an opportunity to resolve the issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Vann v. Vann
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.