Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2000 Ohio 114

Disciplinary Counsel v. Clark

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 2000

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 2000-05-09

On application for reinstatement.

Relies on Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Clark · Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Clark

Decided 2000-05-09

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 
89 Ohio St.3d 1211
.]




                   OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. CLARK.
              [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Clark, 
2000-Ohio-114
.]
                (No. 96-1968—Submitted and decided May 9, 2000.)
                        ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an
application for reinstatement by respondent, Dexter Wayne Clark, Attorney
Registration No. 0006401,
 last known address in Cleveland, Ohio.
        {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of April 30, 1997, wherein
the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of
two years, with one year of the suspension to be stayed and respondent to be placed
on probation on conditions, finds that respondent has substantially complied with
that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,
        {¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that Dexter Wayne Clark be and
hereby is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
        {¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue
certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that
publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent
bear the costs of publication.
        {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Clark (1997), 
78 Ohio St.3d 302
, 
677 N.E.2d 1181
.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________

/2000/ohio/114 · .json · Public domain