State ex rel. Stanfar v. Indus. Comm

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 

.]




  THE STATE EX REL. STANFAR, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF
                                OHIO, APPELLEE, ET AL.
           [Cite as State ex rel. Stanfar v. Indus. Comm., 

.]
Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed.
      (No. 00-15—Submitted July 25, 2000—Decided September 20, 2000.)
     APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 98AP-1397.
                                  __________________
        Tablack, Wellman, Jeren, Hackett & Skoufatos Co., L.P.A., John A. Jeren,
Jr., and Edward J. Hartwig, for appellant.
        Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Mary Ann O. Rini, Assistant
Attorney General, for appellee.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the
opinion of the court of appeals.
        MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
        DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent.
                                  __________________
        ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting.
        {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and order the
Industrial Commission to comply with State ex rel. Noll v. Indus. Comm. (1991),

, 

.
        DOUGLAS and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting
opinion.
                                  __________________