Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2000 OHIO 193 - Miele v. Ribovich

Miele v. Ribovich’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
1
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably 156 Ohio App. 3d 525 - Hamilton Brownfields Redevelopment, LLC v. Duro Tire & Wheel (2004), Shaker House, L.L.C. v. Daniel (2022)

47 state decisions

210200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mandel · Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority v. Jackson · State ex rel. GMS Management Co. v. Callahan · Colonial American Development Co. v. Griffith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A forcible entry and detainer action is intended to serve as an expedited mechanism by which an aggrieved landlord may recover possession of real property.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “These rules, to the extent that they would by their nature be clearly inapplicable, shall not apply to procedure * * * in forcible entry and detainer.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Forcible entry and detainer, as authorized in R.C. Chapter 1923, is a summary proceeding in which 'any judge of a county court' may No. 19AP-567 13 make inquiry into disputes between landlords and tenants, and, where appropriate, order restitution of the premises to the landlord.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.