State ex rel. Agar v. Conrad

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 

.]




       THE STATE EX REL. AGAR, APPELLANT, v. CONRAD, ADMR., ET AL.;
                   INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE.
                [Cite as State ex rel. Agar v. Conrad, 

.]
Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed.
     (No. 00-514—Submitted July 25, 2000—Decided September 20, 2000.)
     APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 98AP-1595.
                                   __________________
          Koltak & Gibson, L.L.P., Ronald J. Koltak and Peter J. Gibson, for
appellant.
          Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Sandee E. Blabolil, Assistant
Attorney General, for appellee.
                                   __________________
          {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the
opinion of the court of appeals.
          MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ.,
concur.
          DOUGLAS, J., dissents.
          F.E. SWEENEY, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of
appeals.
                                   __________________