Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2000 Ohio 261

State v. Sanchez

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 2000

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 2000-02-08

Motion for reconsideration granted on Proposition of Law No. II—Court of appeals' judgment reversed on authority of State v. Dye.

Relies on State v. Dye · State v. Sanchez

Decided 2000-02-08

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 
88 Ohio St.3d 16
.]




            THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. SANCHEZ, APPELLEE.
                      [Cite as State v. Sanchez, 
2000-Ohio-261
.]
Motion for reconsideration granted on Proposition of Law No. II—Court of
        appeals’ judgment reversed on authority of State v. Dye.
    (No. 99-998—Submitted December 14, 1999—Decided February 9, 2000.)
    APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Ashtabula County, No. 98-A-0006.
                          ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION.
                                  __________________
        Thomas L. Sartini, Ashtabula County Prosecuting Attorney, and Ariana E.
Tarighati, Chief Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The motion to reconsider the court’s refusal to grant jurisdiction is
granted on Proposition of Law No. II.
        {¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of
State v. Dye (1998), 
82 Ohio St.3d 323
, 
695 N.E.2d 763
.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________

/2000/ohio/261 · .json · Public domain