2000 OK CR 6 - Taylor v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Chapman v. State of California · Batson v. Kentucky · Davis v. Alaska · United States v. Cronic
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] defense of voluntary intoxication requires that a defendant, first, be intoxicated and, second, be so utterly intoxicated, that his mental powers are overcome, rendering it impossible for a defendant to form the specific criminal intent or special mental element of the crime.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“If voluntary intoxication is to be relied upon as an affirmative defense, the defendant must introduce sufficient evidence to raise a reasonable doubt as to his ability to form the requisite criminal intent.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“voluntary intoxication has long been recognized as a defense to the crime of First Degree Malice Murder.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.