2000 Pa. Super. 399 - Commonwealth v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 2007
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McKinney v. Baldwin · Daniels v. Lassalle · In re the Primary Election of May 21, 1991 · In re Morris · Commonwealth v. Polsky
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We focused our analysis on the language of Rules 600(C) and 600(G). We noted that Rule 600(C) established criteria for when time could be “excluded” from the ... Rule 600(G) 365-day time period.... We then considered the second paragraph of Rule 600(G), which provides that a defendant’s motion to dismiss with prejudice shall be denied and a case shall be tried despite defendant having been on bail without trial commencing for in excess of 365 days, so long as the Commonwealth exercised due diligence and the circumstances requiring the postponement(s) were beyond the Commonwealth’s control. We held that delays meeting the second paragraph of Rule 600(G)’s criteria would form the basis for an “extension” of time for the commencement of trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.