2000 Pa. Super. 402 - In Re Hickson’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2013
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. McHale · 304 Pa. Super. 297 - Commonwealth v. Malloy · J.A.L. v. E.P.H. · In re T.J. · 453 Pa. Super. 78 - Jal v. Eph
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“; or it may be permitted under common law where the status of the petitioner is that of an”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.