Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2000 Pa. Super. 79 - Commonwealth v. Moore

2000 Pa. Super. 79 - Commonwealth v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2003
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Hetherington · Commonwealth v. Reyes · 453 Pa. Super. 36 - Commonwealth v. Waller · 393 Pa. Super. 500 - Commonwealth v. Evans

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]e have no dispute with the Commonwealth’s authority to refile criminal charges where the defect is curable by admission of “new evidence” either not available or discoverable until after a preliminary hearing held to establish a prima facie [sic] case before a District Justice resulted in dismissal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.