State v. Morato’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably State v. Rogers (2009), State v. Guthrie (2001)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Ornelas v. United States · Rhode Island v. Innis · California v. Beheler · Miller v. Fenton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n officer's request that a suspect consent to a search, however, is not an interrogation or its functional equivalent”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Morato's consent to search does not constitute an incriminating statement”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“We recently clarified our standard of review. See State v. Stanga, 2000 SD 129, ¶ 8 , 617 N.W.2d 486, 488 ; State v. Himing, 1999 SD 53, ¶9 , 592 N.W.2d 600, 603 . Fact findings are reviewed for clear error, but ultimately, in reviewing decisions on motions to suppress for asserted constitutional violations our standard of review is de novo. Stanga, 2000 SD 129, ¶ 8 , 617 N.W.2d at 488 (citing Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 , 699, 116 S.Ct. 1657, 1663 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911, 920 (1996)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Barton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.