Krebs v. Weber’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 2005
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Anders v. California · Gideon v. Wainwright · Coleman v. Thompson · Vandygriff v. Phillips
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If a person has been committed, detained, imprisoned or restrained of his liberty, under any color or pretence whatever, civil or criminal, and if upon application made in good faith to the court or judge thereof, having jurisdiction, for a writ of habeas corpus, it is satisfactorily shown that the person is without means to prosecute the proceeding, the court or judge shall appoint counsel for the indigent person pursuant to chapter 23A-40. Such counsel fees or expenses shall be a charge against and be paid by the county from which the person was committed, or for which the person is held as determined by the court. Payment of all such fees or expenses shall be made only upon written order of the court or judge issuing the writ. (emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Jackson v. Weber“(1) whether the court has jurisdiction of the crime and the person of the defendant; (2) whether the sentence was authorized by law; and (3) in certain cases whether an incarcerated defendant has been deprived of basic constitutional rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Knecht v. Weber“Krebs argues Thompson rendered ineffective assistance of counsel per Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984) during his first habeas proceeding....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jackson v. Weber
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.