Peterson v. Peterson’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 2024
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 61 (Payment-in-Kind Tax Treatment Act of 1983)
Relies on Hartpence v. Youth Forestry Camp · Gross v. Gross · Grode v. Grode · 108 Wis. 2d 586 - Sommer v. Sommer · Hautala v. Hautala
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The monthly net income of each parent shall be determined by his gross income less allowable deductions, as set forth herein. The monthly gross income of each parent includes amounts received from the following sources: (5) Gain or loss from the sale, trade or conversion of capital assets....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The deductions allowed from gross monthly income to arrive at each parent’s net monthly income for purposes of calculating child support are listed in SDCL 25-7-6.7. Among the allowable deductions are “[p]ayments made on other support and maintenance orders.” Since alimony is a payment for the support and maintenance of a dependent spouse, it is deducted from the payor’s gross monthly income as another support and maintenance order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Haanen v. Haanen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.