Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2000 SD 70 - State v. Charger

State v. Charger’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Daniels v. Lassalle · United States v. Azure · United States v. Rosenberg · State v. Copeland · United States v. Jeter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Not all out-of-court statements are hearsay. The hearsay rule only prohibits admission of evidence of out-of-court statements offered to prove the truth of the out-of-court declaration.... Utterances made contemporaneously with or immediately preparatory to an act which is material to the litigation that tends to explain, illustrate, or show the object or motive of an equivocal act and which are offered irrespective of the truth of any assertion they contain, are not hearsay and are admissible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Testimony concerning telephone calls made to or received at a particular location has been held admissible frequently in prosecutions for bookmaking and other gambling activities, where such testimony is offered not to establish the truth of what was said over the telephone, but as evidence that the calls were made to the location for the purpose of placing bets.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.