Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2000 SD 76 - Openhowski v. Mahone

Openhowski v. Mahone’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
August 2004
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chipperfield v. Woessner · Busby v. Shafer · Wissink v. Van De Stroet · Burke v. Foss

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If when the cause of action shall accrue against any person he shall be out of the state, such action may be commenced within the terms herein respectively limited after the return of such person into this state; and if after such cause of action shall have accrued, such person shall depart from and reside out of the state, the time of his absence shall not be deemed or taken as any part of the time limited for the commencement of such aetion[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “An attempt to commence an action is deemed equivalent to the commencement thereof when the summons is delivered, with the intent that it shall be actually served, to the sheriff or other officer of the county in which the defendants, or one of them, usually or last resided.... Such an attempt must be followed by the first publication of the summons, or the service thereof, within sixty days.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.