Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2000 SD 99 - Hoekman v. Nelson

Hoekman v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
4
states following
June 2014
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Glanzer v. . Shepard · Wilson v. Great Northern Railway Company · Bego v. Gordon · 361 Pa. Super. 35 - Askew by Askew v. Zeller · Wulf v. Rebbun

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) [Horner's] failure to exercise reasonable care increase[d] the risk of such harm, or (b) [Horner] ha[d] undertaken to perform a duty owed by [Warne and Schoenfelder] to [Kuehl], or (c) the harm [was] suffered because of reliance of [Warne and Schoenfelder] or [Kuehl] upon the undertaking.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Under the facts and circumstances in this case, [the driver who waived pedestrian across his lane] did not owe a duty of care to ensure [pedestrian's] safety across the entire street.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.