¶2 1992 Gross Receipts
¶3 Deposited in
¶4 Payor Amount Payee Account No.
¶5 _____ ______ _____ ____________
¶6Educational
¶7 Zoological
¶8 Programs, Inc. $ 100 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶9Anheuser-Busch 2,000 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶10Anheuser-Busch 2,700 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶11Anheuser-Busch 1,400 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶12Timothy L. Charles 500 Galingale Group 400359863
¶13Anheuser-Busch 1,400 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶14Avian Farms 560 Galingale Group 400359863
¶15Avian Farms 350 Galingale Group 400359863
¶16Avian Farms 70 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶17Anheuser-Busch 1,600 Plume Enterprises 23-043-10
¶18Anheuser-Busch*396 1,200 Plume Enterprises 23-043-10
¶19Anheuser-Busch 1,200 Plume Enterprises 23-043-10
¶20Anheuser-Busch 1,200 Plume Enterprises 23-043-10
¶21Anheuser-Busch 1,200 Plume Enterprises 23-043-10
¶22Anheuser-Busch 1,200 Plume Enterprises 23-043-10
¶23Anheuser-Busch 1,200 Plume Enterprises 23-043-10
¶24 ______
¶25 Total 17,880
¶26 1992 Royalty Income
¶27 Deposited in
¶28 Payor Amount Payee Account No.
¶29 _____ ______ _____ ____________
¶30Pennzoil Products $ 155 Trundle Management
¶31 Eton Trust Co.,
¶32 Ltd., Trustee n1 1163506106
¶33Pennzoil Products 281 Trundle Management
¶34 Eton Trust Co.,
¶35*397 Ltd., Trustee 1163506106
¶36Pennzoil Products 257 Trundle Management
¶37 Eton Trust Co.,
¶38 Ltd., Trustee 1163506106
¶39Pennzoil Products 332 Trundle Management
¶40 Eton Trust Co.,
¶41 Ltd., Trustee 1163506106
¶42Pennzoil Products 745 Trundle Management
¶43 Eton Trust Co.,
¶44 Ltd., Trustee 1163506106
¶45Pennzoil Products 432 Trundle Management
¶46 Eton Trust Co.,
¶47 Ltd., Trustee 1163506106
¶48 ______
¶49Total 2,203
¶50 Total Income n2 20,083
¶51RUWE, JUDGE: *398 Respondent determined deficiencies and additions to tax in petitioner's Federal income tax as follows:
¶52 Additions to tax
¶53 ___________________________________
¶54 Sec. Sec. Sec.
¶55 Year Deficiency 6651(f) 6653(b)(1) 6654(a)
¶56 ____ __________ _________ __________ _________
¶57 1988 $ 26,874 N/A $ 20,156 $ 1,718
¶58 1989 29,683 $ 22,262 N/A 2,006
¶59 1990 25,383 19,037 N/A 1,671
¶60 1991 7,078 5,309 N/A 410
¶61 1992 4,572 3,429 N/A 200
¶62After concessions, 1 the issues for decision are: (1) Whether petitioner had unreported income from veterinary services, the sale of animals, and oil and gas royalties in the years in issue; (2) whether petitioner is liable for additions to tax for fraud under sections 6653(b)(1) 2 and 6651(f); *399 (3) whether petitioner is liable for failure to pay estimated tax under section 6654(a); and (4) whether petitioner is liable for the imposition of a penalty under section 6673 for taking a frivolous and groundless position in these proceedings.
FINDINGS OF FACT¶63Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found. At the time the petition was filed, petitioner resided in Bristolville, Ohio.
¶64During the years in issue, petitioner and his wife*400 Catherine Temple (Mrs. Temple) lived at 5955 Stroups Hickox Road, Bristolville, Ohio (5955 property). The 5955 property was a country home with more than 300 acres.
¶65During the years in issue, petitioner was a veterinarian, and he operated a veterinary clinic out of his residence. Petitioner performed services as a veterinarian for several clients including Sea World, 3 Anheuser Busch, the Ohio Department of Wildlife, Canton Veterinary Hospital, Educational Zoological Programs, Inc., Constance A. Halle, Robert M. Sabo, and Wendy Arbogast. Petitioner also provided expert testimony for ITT Hartford.
¶66Petitioner also had property located at 5501 Stroups Hickox Road (5501 property). Petitioner used the 5955 and 5501 properties for livestock breeding. Petitioner bred and sold llamas and birds during the years in issue. Petitioner sold llamas or birds to the following customers: John C. or Maria L. Gifford, Kerney L. and Ann R. Martini, Llamas of Michigan, Swan Lake Llamas, *401 Avian Farms, Ronald G. and Carole L. DeRhodes, Sunny Hill Farms, William L. and Maureen F. Crawford, Fish and Feathers Intl., Ronald C. and Lisa Blider, Educational Zoological Programs, Inc., 4 Robert M. Sabo, Dennis Grodings, Jerome T. and Barbara A. Grone, Timothy L. Charles, William J. and Patricia M. Boever, Mary Z. Reed, and Wendy Arbogast.
¶67During the years in issue, petitioner's gross receipts from services provided as a veterinarian and from the sale of animals were as follows:
¶68 Year Gross Receipts
¶69 ____ ______________
¶75 ____________
¶76 Total 244,453
¶77*402 Approximately half of petitioner's receipts during 1988 were in the form of checks payable to Dr. Temple, while the remaining checks were payable to Plume Enterprises. 5 Payments in 1989, 1990, 1991, and 1992 were almost exclusively made to Plume Enterprises, except for one check in the amount of $ 15,500 6 in 1990, 7 one check in the amount of $ 600 in 1991, 8 and three checks totaling $ 1,410 in 1992. 9
¶78*403 With the exception of one check issued in 1989 and seven checks issued in 1992, all checks payable to Plume Enterprises were deposited in an account with Bank One, 10 account No. 400359855 (Bank One 855 account), held in the name of Plume Enterprises. 11 Oxford Charter Corp. was listed as trustee on Plume Enterprises' Bank One 855 account. L. R. Mayer was the executive director of Oxford Charter Corp. during 1987.
¶79Mrs. Temple had signatory authority over the Bank One 855 account, and the monthly bank statements were sent to petitioner's residence. During the years in issue, Mrs. Temple signed the following checks drawn on Plume Enterprises' Bank One 855 account:
¶80 Year Payee Amount
¶81 ____ _____ ______
¶82 1989 Lets Go Travel $ *404 240
¶83 1989 Lets Go Travel 480
¶84 1989 Cash 1,000
¶85 1989 R&J Auto Services 404
¶86 1989 DS.BA 625
¶87 1990 R&J Auto Services 814
¶88 1990 R&J Auto Services 169
¶89 1990 Action Travel 791
¶90 1990 Radisson Resort 497
¶91 1990 Action Travel 158
¶92 1990 Admiral Bendoro 144
¶93 1990 Trundle Management 1 2,000
¶94 1990 Trundle Management 2 1,500
¶95 1990 Trundle Management 500
¶96 1991 Action Travel 278
¶97 1991 Hotel Westcourt 162
¶98 1991 *405 Action Travel 318
¶99 1991 Action Travel 296
¶100 1991 Greenbelt Holiday Inn 67
¶101 1992 Control Management Inc. 400
¶102 1992 Cash 391
¶103 1992 McMeyers & Ford, Inc. 300
¶104 _______
¶105 Total 11,534
¶106The one check issued in 1989 that was not deposited into the Bank One 855 account was deposited in another Bank One account, account No. 400359863 (Bank One 863 account). *406 The Bank One 863 account was held in the name of Galingale Group, Oxford Charter Corp., Trustee. 12 L. R. Mayer was the executive director of Oxford Charter Corp. during 1987.
¶107Mrs. Temple had signatory authority over the Bank One 863 account, and during the years in issue, she signed the following checks drawn on that account:
¶108 Year Payee Amount
¶109 ____ _____ ______
¶110 1988 Lets Go Travel $ 694
¶111 1988 Bavarian Manor 50
¶112 1988 Custom Parrot Network 10,000
¶113 1988 Bavarian Manor 133
¶114 1988 Sheraton Centre 531
¶115 1988 Custom Parrot Network 3,500
¶116*407 1988 Trundle Management 1 2,000
¶117 1989 The Sheraton Greensboro 512
¶118 1989 DS.BA 1,250
¶119 1989 Lets Go Travel 724
¶120 1989 Regal Travel 138
¶121 1990 Trundle Management 2 2,000
¶122 1990 Home Centers 281
¶123 1991 Trundle Management 3 2,000
¶124 1991 Trundle Management 4 2,000
¶125 1991 Cash 300
¶126 1991 Cash 500
¶127 1992 Cash 107
¶128 _______
¶129 Total 26,720
¶130*408 The seven checks issued in 1992 that were not deposited in the Bank One 855 account were deposited in an account with Cortland Savings and Banking Co.13 held in the name of Plume Enterprises. These checks totaled $ 8,800, and they were deposited from August to December 1992 in the Cortland Savings account. Neither petitioner nor his wife was listed as having signatory authority over the Cortland Savings account, but monthly bank statements 14 were sent to their residence, which was also the address listed on the signature card as the account
¶131During 1992, the following checks were drawn on the Plume Enterprises' Cortland Savings account:
¶132 Year Payee Amount
¶133 ____ _____ ______
¶134 1992 Comfort Suites $ 164
¶135*409 1992 L. R. Mayer 1 125
¶136 1992 Action Travel 220
¶137 1992 Galt House 386
¶138 1992 Piccolo Co. 1,000
¶139 1992 Control Management, Inc. 2 400
¶140 1992 McMyers & Ford 3 300
¶141 1992 Piccolo Co. 5,458
¶142 ______
¶143 Total 8,053
¶144*410 All the above-listed checks were written between September and December 1992. The two largest checks drawn on the Cortland Savings account, one for $ 1,000 and the other for $ 5,458, were payable to Piccolo Co. The check for $ 1,000 was written on October 29, 1992, and the check for $ 5,458 was written on December 31, 1992. Piccolo Co. had an account with Second National Bank of Warren, 15 account No. 1163353006 (Second National 006 account). 16
¶145G. Bodor had signatory authority over Piccolo's account with Second National Bank. 17 During the years in issue, G. Bodor signed the following checks, all of which were drawn on Piccolo Co.'s Second National 006 account:
¶147 ____ ______ _____
¶148 1988 $ 10,000 Purfle Co.
¶149 1988 14,000 Purfle Co.
¶150 1988 10,000 Purfle Co.
¶151 1988 7,630 Purfle Co.
¶152 1989 22,571 Purfle Co.
¶153 1989 5,000 Purfle Co.
¶154 1989 9,597 Purfle Co.
¶155 1990 5,000 Purfle Co.
¶156 1991 4,400 Purfle Co.
¶157 1991 4,479 Purfle Co.
¶159 ______
¶160 Total 94,677
¶161The first seven checks listed above, totaling $ 78,798, were deposited*412 into a Dollar Savings and Trust Co. account, account No. 218-000-827 (Dollar Savings 827 account). The Dollar Savings 827 account was held in the name of Purfle Co. with Eton Trust Co., Ltd., as trustee. 18 Both petitioner and Mrs. Temple had signatory authority over the Dollar Savings 827 account.
¶162Mrs. Temple signed checks payable to cash and drawn on the Dollar Savings 827 account during the years in issue as follows:
¶163 Year Amount
¶164 ____ ______
¶165 1989 $ 4,000
¶166 1989 4,500
¶167 1989 4,500
¶168 1989 1,500
¶169 1989 2,000
¶170 1989 2,892
¶171 1989 4,833
¶172 1989 4,000
¶173 1989 4,500
¶174 1989 4,000
¶176 Total 36,725
¶177In addition to the above-listed checks payable to cash, Mrs. Temple withdrew $ 5,000 from the Dollar Savings 827 account in the form of a cashier's check payable to petitioner. Purfle Co. was remitter on another check drawn on a Dollar Savings bank account and payable to petitioner in the amount of $ 5,000.
¶178The last four checks, listed on the previous page, and drawn on the Second National 006 account, totaled $ 15,879. All these checks were deposited into a second bank account with Dollar Savings and Trust Co., account No. 213-593-320 (Dollar Savings 320 account). The Dollar Savings 320 account was held in the name of Purfle Co. with Eaton Trust Co., Ltd., as trustee. 19 Both petitioner and Mrs. Temple had signatory authority over this account.
¶179Mrs. Temple signed checks payable to cash and drawn on the Dollar Savings 320 account during the years in issue*414 as follows:
¶180 Year Amount
¶181 ____ ______
¶182 1990 $ 1,500
¶183 1990 500
¶184 1990 500
¶185 1990 2,500
¶186 1991 3,000
¶187 1991 2,000
¶188 1991 2,000
¶189 1991 1,500
¶190 1991 200
¶191 1992 2,000
¶192 1992 2,500
¶193 1992 2,000
¶194 ______
¶195 Total 20,200
¶196On May 26, 1992, B. L. Holtzhauer replaced petitioner and Mrs. Temple as the person authorized to sign checks on the Dollar Savings 320 account. The following checks payable to cash were signed by B. L. Holtzhauer:
¶197 Year Amount
¶198 ____ ______
¶199 1992 $ 1,000
¶200 1992 1,000
¶201 1992 2,045
¶202 ______
¶204On December 7, 1992, the Dollar Savings 320 account was closed, and the proceeds were deposited into Barclays Bank, Nassau, Bahamas.
¶205Prior to February 1985, petitioner was title owner of the 5501 and 5955 properties. On February 28, 1985, petitioner granted his interest in the 5501 and 5955 properties to Black Creek Management Co. with Nassau Life Insurance Co., 20 Ltd., as trustee 21 by warranty deeds.
¶206*416 Oil and gas drilling sites were located on both the 5501 and 5955 properties. On February 1, 1985, petitioner executed an Exchange of Royalty Interest with Old Labrador Investment Co. with Nassau Life Insurance Co., Ltd., as trustee. The Exchange of Royalty Interest indicates that petitioner granted Old Labrador Investment Co. with Nassau Life Insurance Co., Ltd., as trustee his interest in the oil and gas leases for both properties for a stated consideration of $ 10. The Exchange of Royalty Interest was recorded in the Trumbull County Recorder's Office on February 28, 1985.
¶207On January 25, 1988, Black Creek Management Co. with Nassau Life Insurance Co., Ltd., as trustee granted by warranty deed for a stated consideration of $ 1 the 5501 and 5955 properties to Trundle Management with Eton Trust Co., Ltd., as trustee 22 by warranty deed. 23 On the same day, Old Labrador Investment Co. with Nassau Life Insurance Co., Ltd., as trustee, granted for $ 1 in consideration its royalty interest in the oil and gas leases in both properties to Trundle Management with Eton Trust Co., Ltd., as trustee.
¶208*417 Petitioner and his wife continued to reside at the 5955 property. Petitioner continued to use the 5501 and 5955 properties for livestock operations and to operate a veterinary clinic. Petitioner continued to exercise dominion and control over the 5501 and 5955 properties.
¶209Pennzoil Oil and Scavenger Oil paid royalties for use of the oil and gas wells located on both properties during the years in issue. Royalty payments from Pennzoil and Scavenger were as follows:
¶210 Year Royalty Income
¶211 ____ ______________
¶215 _______
¶216 Total 7,191
¶217With the exception of one deposit, all checks were deposited into an account with the Second National Bank*418 of Warren, account No. 1163506106 (Second National 106 account). The account was held in the name of Trundle Management, Eton Trust Co., Ltd., Trustee. 24 Originally, Mrs. Temple and P. Evans had signature authority over the account. Petitioner's address was listed on the signature card. On July 7, 1992, B. L. Holtzhauer's name was added to the signature card. The address listed as B. L. Holtzhauer's address on the signature card was petitioner's residence. Bank statements were sent to petitioner's residence.
¶218During the years in issue, Mrs. Temple signed checks drawn on the Second National 106 account as follows:
¶219 Year Amount Payee
¶220 ____ ______ _____
¶221 1989 $ 500 Cash
¶222 1989 500 Cash
¶223 1989 312 DS.BA
¶224 1990 1,000 Cash
¶225 1990 *419 3,450 Sweda Heating & Cooling
¶226 1990 1,316 R.C. Drywall
¶227 _____
¶229Petitioner was in the process of remodeling and expanding his personal residence in 1989.
¶230Petitioner made a $ 5,000 deposit into the Second National 106 account in 1988. The source of the $ 5,000 deposit was a bank check payable to petitioner drawn from one of the Dollar Savings and Trust accounts.
¶231Petitioner filed Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, for the years 1975 through 1979. Petitioner did not file a Federal income tax return for 1980, and he has not filed a Federal income tax return for any year since 1980.
OPINIONI. UNREPORTED INCOME¶232Petitioner failed to file Federal income tax returns for the years 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, and 1992. Respondent determined that petitioner was engaged in the business activity of performing*420 veterinary services and selling livestock during those years. Respondent computed petitioner's business gross receipts based on deposits made to bank accounts which petitioner controlled during those years, taking into account transfers and nontaxable items. Respondent also determined that petitioner received royalty income during the years 1990, 1991, and 1992.
¶233Petitioner does not dispute the existence of the transactions that produced the income that respondent attributes to him. Rather, petitioner argues that the income was received by, and deposited into bank accounts of, valid irrevocable trusts. Petitioner asserts that respondent has improperly imputed gross income received by a trust to petitioner and has improperly failed to recognize the trust as a separate entity. We note, as a preliminary matter, that petitioner did not provide copies of any trust agreements, nor did he or his wife testify at trial.
¶234Section 61(a) provides, in part, that "gross income means all income from whatever source derived, including (but not limited to)" compensation for services, gains derived from dealing in property and royalties. It is fundamental to our system of taxation that income must be*421 taxed to the one who earns it. See Commissioner v. Culbertson, 337 U.S. 733, 739-740, 93 L. Ed. 1659, 69 S. Ct. 1210 (1949); Lucas v. Earl, 281 U.S. 111, 114-115, 74 L. Ed. 731, 50 S. Ct. 241 (1930). Income can be attributed to an individual when the recipient has total control or dominion over the funds and uses the funds for personal purposes. See Davis v. United States, 226 F.2d 331, 334 (6th Cir. 1955); Woods v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 1989-611, affd. without published opinion 929 F.2d 702 (6th Cir. 1991).
A. VETERINARIAN SERVICES AND THE SALE OF LIVESTOCK¶235Petitioner provided veterinarian services, and he bred and sold animals. As a result, petitioner received payments by checks totaling $ 47,750 in 1988, 25 $ 88,404 in 1989, 26 $ 74,360 in 1990, 27 $ 16,059 in 1991, 28 and $ 17,880 in 1992. 29 In 1988, checks totaling $ 11,000 were payable to Dr. Temple, while the remaining checks totaling $ 36,750 were payable to Plume Enterprises and deposited into the Bank One 855 account. This account was fashioned as a trustee account, but all funds deposited in the account were based on payments petitioner received for veterinarian services that he provided and from the sale*422 of animals that he sold. Mrs. Temple had signatory authority over the account.
¶236In 1989, petitioner received checks totaling $ 88,404 for the services he provided as a veterinarian and from the sale of animals. Petitioner deposited checks totaling $ 87,804 in the Bank One 855 account, and the remaining check for $ 600 in the Bank One 863 account. Petitioner's spouse, Mrs. Temple, had signatory authority over both accounts.
¶237In 1990, petitioner received checks totaling $ 74,360 for the services he provided as a veterinarian and from the sale of animals. Petitioner deposited checks totaling $ 74,360 into the Bank One 855 account, which Mrs. Temple had signatory authority over.
¶238In 1991, petitioner received checks totaling $ 16,059 for the services he provided as a veterinarian and from the sale of animals. 30 Petitioner deposited checks totaling $ 16,059 into the Bank One 855 account, which Mrs. Temple had signatory*423 authority over.
¶239In 1992, petitioner received checks totaling $ 17,880 for the services he provided as a veterinarian and from the sale of animals. Petitioner deposited checks totaling $ 7,670 in the Bank One 855 account and checks totaling $ 1,410 in the Bank One 863 account. Mrs. Temple had signatory authority over both accounts.
¶240Amounts deposited into the Bank One 855 account in the name of Plume Enterprises and the Bank One 863 account in the name of Galingale Group constituted income of petitioner. Petitioner earned the income, he and his wife exercised total dominion and control over those funds, and they expended the funds for their personal expenses. From these two accounts alone, Mrs. Temple signed checks totaling $ 38,254 31 for personal items, including cash, travel agencies, hotels, auto services and deposits to other accounts over which*424 she had signatory authority.
¶241The remaining payments received by petitioner in 1992, checks totaling $ 8,800, from services he provided as a veterinarian and animals that he sold were deposited into the Cortland Savings account between August and December 1992. Neither petitioner nor his wife was listed as having signatory authority over the Cortland Savings account; however, monthly bank statements were sent to petitioner's residence, and the signature card listed petitioner's address as the account owner's address.
¶242During the period from September to December 1992, checks totaling $ 8,053 were drawn on the Cortland Savings account. A majority of those funds, checks totaling $ 6,458, were deposited in an account with the Second National Bank of Warren. 32 G. Bodor had signatory authority over the Second National 006 account, and during the years in issue she wrote checks totaling*425 $ 94,677 and deposited them into one of two Dollar Savings and Trust accounts. Petitioner and his wife had signatory authority over both Dollar Savings and Trust accounts. We find that the $ 8,800 was earned by petitioner and then funneled through the various accounts as part of petitioner's overall plan to conceal income. Once we view through the layers of nominee accounts through which the funds were channeled, petitioner remained in control of the funds.
B. ROYALTY INCOME¶243A fundamental principle of income tax law is that economic substance prevails over form. See Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U.S. 465, 79 L. Ed. 596, 55 S. Ct. 266 (1935). "When the form of the transaction has not, in fact, altered any cognizable economic relationships, *426 we will look through that form and apply the tax law according to the substance of the transaction." Zmuda v. Commissioner, 79 T.C. 714, 720 (1982), affd. 731 F.2d 1417 (9th Cir. 1984). This rule applies regardless of whether the entity has a separate existence recognized under State law and whether, in form, it is a trust, a common-law business trust, or some other form of jural entity. See id.
¶244We find the various transactions which purported to result in a transfer of petitioner's interest in the 5501 and 5955 properties and his royalty interest in those properties to be without economic substance. Petitioner always remained in possession of the properties, and he continued to control the properties as he had done before the transfers.
¶245Petitioner and his wife continued to live in their residence located on the 5955 property. Petitioner continued to use the properties for livestock breeding, sale of livestock, and operation of a veterinary clinic. Petitioner, regardless of legal title, exercised dominion and control over the properties.
¶246Payments of $ 7,191 were made for the use of oil and gas wells located on petitioner's properties during the years in*427 issue. With the exception of one check for $ 1,800, payments totaling $ 5,391 were deposited into the Second National 106 account. Mrs. Temple had signatory authority over this account, petitioner's address was listed on the signature card, and bank statements were mailed to petitioner's residence.
¶247Mrs. Temple signed checks totaling $ 2,000 payable to cash in 1989 and 1990 and checks totaling $ 4,766 in 1990 to contractors from this account. Petitioner was in the process of remodeling and expanding his personal residence in 1989.
¶248The one check for $ 1,800 that was not deposited in the Second National 106 account was deposited into the Bank One 855 account. Mrs. Temple signed checks totaling $ 11,534 for personal items including, cash, hotels, several travel agencies, and an automobile service shop drawn on this account.
¶249Petitioner argues that if the income items in appendixes F through J are attributed to him, then respondent has failed to subtract expenses or deductions from petitioner's gross receipts for each year in issue. However, petitioner did not provide any evidence regarding allowable expenses or deductions, and neither petitioner nor his wife testified.
¶250Even in criminal*428 tax evasion cases, where the Government bears the greater burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, it is well settled "that evidence of unexplained receipts shifts to the taxpayer the burden of coming forward with evidence as to the amount of offsetting expenses, if any." Siravo v. United States, 377 F.2d 469, 473 (1st Cir. 1967); see also Franklin v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 1993-184. Where the taxpayer has failed to file a return, or his return shows no receipts from a particular activity, then the assumption that he, more readily than respondent, has access to evidence of deductions or other offsetting amounts makes the nonexistence of such amounts a fair presumption, at least as an initial matter and absent a satisfactory explanation of such nonexistence or the production of some probative evidence. See Franklin v. Commissioner, supra.
¶251We hold that petitioner had unreported taxable income of $ 47,750 in 1988, $ 88,404 in 1989, $ 77,149 in 1990, $ 18,258 in 1991, and $ 20,083 in 1992. See appendixes F through J.
II. ADDITIONS TO TAX FOR FRAUD¶252The next issue is whether any part of the underpayment of income tax for each year in issue is*429 due to fraud. Respondent's notice of deficiency determined that petitioner is liable for the addition to tax for fraud imposed under section 6653(b)(1) 33 for the taxable year 1988 and for the addition to tax for fraudulent failure to file under section 6651(f) 34 for the taxable years 1989, 1990, 1991, and 1992. Each section imposes an addition to tax equal to 75 percent of the portion of an underpayment that is attributable to fraud. Because these provisions are analyzed similarly as to the determination of fraudulent intent, we consolidate our discussion of respondent's fraud determinations. See Clayton v. Commissioner, 102 T.C. 632, 653 (1994).
¶253*430Respondent has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that an underpayment exists for the years in issue and that some portion of the underpayment is due to fraud. See sec. 7454(a); Rule 142(b); Niedringhaus v. Commissioner, 99 T.C. 202, 210 (1992). Consequently, respondent must establish: (1) Petitioner has underpaid his taxes for each year; and (2) some part of the underpayment is due to fraud. See DiLeo v. Commissioner, 96 T.C. 858, 873 (1991), affd. 959 F.2d 16 (2d Cir. 1992). Fraud is the intentional wrongdoing on the part of a taxpayer to evade a tax believed to be owing. See Petzoldt v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 661, 698 (1989). Where fraud is determined for each of several years, respondent's burden applies separately or each of the years. See Drieborg v. Commissioner, 225 F.2d 216, 219-220 (6th Cir. 1955), affg. in part and revg. in part a Memorandum Opinion of this Court dated Feb. 24, 1954.
A. UNDERPAYMENT OF TAXES¶254Based on the evidence presented and our previous analysis, we find that respondent has clearly and convincingly established that petitioner understated his taxable income by $ 47,750*43135 in 1988, $ 88,404 36 in 1989, $ 77,149 37 in 1990, $ 18,258 38 in 1991, and $ 20,083 39 in 1992. Petitioner underpaid his taxes for each year in issue.
B. FRAUDULENT INTENT¶255Respondent must prove that a portion of the underpayment is attributable to the fraudulent intent of petitioner. Fraud is the intentional wrongdoing motivated by a specific purpose to evade a tax known or believed to be owing. See Stoltzfus v. United States, 398 F.2d 1002, 1004 (3d Cir. 1968). The existence of fraud is a question of fact to be resolved upon consideration of the entire record. See Gajewski v. Commissioner, 67 T.C. 181, 199 (1976), affd. without published opinion 578 F.2d 1383 (8th Cir. 1978).
¶256Direct proof of a taxpayer's intent is rarely available; thus, fraud may be proven by circumstantial evidence, and reasonable inferences may be drawn from*432 the relevant facts. See Spies v. United States, 317 U.S. 492, 499, 87 L. Ed. 418, 63 S. Ct. 364 (1943); Stephenson v. Commissioner, 79 T.C. 995, 1006 (1982), affd. 748 F.2d 331 (6th Cir. 1984). Any conduct, the likely effect of which would be to mislead or to conceal may establish an affirmative act of evasion. See Spies v. United States, supra at 499.
¶257The courts have relied upon a number of indicia of fraud in deciding whether an underpayment of tax is due to fraud. While no single factor is necessarily sufficient to establish fraud, the existence of several indicia is persuasive circumstantial evidence of fraud. See Petzoldt v. Commissioner, supra.
¶258Respondent argues that the following factors or "badges" of fraud are present in this case: (1) A substantial and consistent understatement of income; (2) extensive dealings in cash; (3) use of nominee accounts; 40 (4) failure to cooperate with revenue agents; and (5) petitioner's level of education.
*433 1. SUBSTANTIAL AND CONSISTENT UNDERSTATEMENT OF INCOME¶259Consistent failure to report substantial amounts of income over a number of years is, standing alone, highly persuasive evidence of fraudulent intent. See Kurnick v. Commissioner, 232 F.2d 678 (6th Cir. 1956), affg. T.C. Memo 1955-31; Reash v. Commissioner, 218 F.2d 954 (6th Cir. 1954), affg. per curiam a Memorandum Opinion of this Court dated Dec. 28, 1953. In this case, there is a substantial and consistent underpayment of tax for each of the years in issue.
2. EXTENSIVE DEALINGS IN CASH¶260Dealing in cash to avoid scrutiny of one's finances is a badge of fraud. See Bradford v. Commissioner, 796 F.2d 303, 307-308 (9th Cir. 1986), affg. T.C. Memo 1984-601. Petitioner made numerous and substantial cash transactions during the 5 years in issue.
¶261During the years in issue, Mrs. Temple signed checks payable to cash totaling $ 59,223 that were drawn on four different accounts, all of which were fashioned as trust accounts. Mrs. Temple was not a named trustee on any of these accounts. For the short period of time that B. L. Holtzauer replaced petitioner and Mrs. Temple*434 on the Dollar Savings 320 account, checks totaling $ 4,045 were issued payable to cash. The last check issued to cash in the amount of $ 2,045 was used toward the purchase of a bank check for $ 2,645. The Dollar Savings 320 account was closed, and the proceeds deposited into an account in Nassau, Bahamas.
¶262Wendy Arbogast was one of petitioner's clients. Ms. Arbogast testified that she had purchased a bird from petitioner for $ 1,400 but paid $ 800 of the purchase price in cash. Ms. Arbogast testified that petitioner told her when she started going to him for veterinary services that he preferred cash payments.
3. USE OF NOMINEE ACCOUNTS¶263Use of nominees to conceal assets that a taxpayer has unfettered control over is evidence of fraud. See Friedman v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 1968-145, affd. 421 F.2d 658 (6th Cir. 1970).
¶264Petitioner received checks from various customers for providing veterinarian services, the sale of animals, and royalties and deposited them into various bank accounts fashioned as trustee accounts. These deposits were derived from income earned by and taxable to petitioner. The accounts were fashioned as trust accounts in an effort by petitioner*435 to disguise the true ownership of the accounts.
4. FAILURE TO COOPERATE WITH REVENUE AGENTS¶265Failure to cooperate with revenue agents during the audit phase of a case is an additional indication of guilty knowledge on a taxpayer's part. See Professional Servs. v. Commissioner, 79 T.C. 888, 933 (1982).
¶266Revenue Agent Gentile conducted the examination of petitioner for the years in issue. Mr. Gentile testified that as an initial step in his examination of petitioner, he sent petitioner two appointment letters. However, petitioner did not appear at either appointment and did not provide any books or records during the course of the examination.
5. LEVEL OF EDUCATION¶267A taxpayer's level of education and his prior history of filing proper Federal income tax returns are relevant. See Stephenson v. Commissioner, 79 T.C. 995 (1982).
¶268Petitioner is a doctor of veterinary medicine. A person with his level of education should know that he cannot escape liability from income taxation and still enjoy control and dominion over all the income he received by establishing nominee accounts. Petitioner filed Federal income tax returns for 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, and 1979. *436 His filing of proper returns for years prior to the years in issue demonstrates that he was aware of his income tax responsibilities.
C. CONCLUSION¶269The facts and circumstances of this case clearly and convincingly support respondent's determination of fraud for each year in issue.
III. ADDITIONS TO TAX FOR FAILURE TO PAY ESTIMATED TAX¶270For 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, and 1992, respondent determined additions to tax for failure to pay estimated tax under section 6654. If there is an underpayment of estimated tax for any of the years in issue, section 6654(a) imposes an addition to tax equal to the interest rate established under section 6621 applied to the amount of the underpayment for the period of the underpayment. This addition to tax is mandatory and, unless one of the exceptions in section 6654(e) applies, is imposed regardless of reasonable cause or extenuating circumstances. See Dodge v. Commissioner, 96 T.C. 172, 183 (1991), affd. on this issue 981 F.2d 350 (8th Cir. 1992); Grosshandler v. Commissioner, 75 T.C. 1, 21 (1980).
¶271The Commissioner's determinations of additions to tax under section 6654 are presumed to be correct, and the taxpayer*437 bears the burden of proving that he is not liable for those additions. See Rule 142(a). Petitioner did not offer any evidence that he paid estimated tax for 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, and 1992. Accordingly, we sustain respondent's determination.
IV. PENALTY PURSUANT TO SECTION 6673¶272Under section 6673, this Court may award a penalty to the United States of up to $ 25,000 when the proceeding has been instituted or maintained by the taxpayer primarily for delay or if the taxpayer's position in such proceeding is frivolous or groundless. See sec. 6673. Based on the record, we conclude that such an award is appropriate in this case. Petitioner's argument that he can escape liability for income tax by purporting to assign earnings from his personal activities to a series of trusts is frivolous. Accordingly, a penalty is awarded to the United States under section 6673 in the amount of $ 5,000.
¶273We have considered all arguments in this case. Those arguments not discussed herein are without merit or irrelevant. To reflect the foregoing,
¶274An appropriate order will be issued granting respondent's motion for a penalty, and decision will be entered under Rule 155.
¶275APPENDIX A
¶2761988 Gross Receipts
¶277As*438 Stated in Notice of Deficiency 1 Concessions Total
¶278_____________________________________ ___________ _____
¶279 Payor Amount
¶280 _____ ______
¶281Sea World of Ohio $ 500 0 $ 500
¶282Sea World of Ohio 500 0 500
¶283Sea World of Ohio 1,000 0 1,000
¶284Sea World of Ohio 1,500 0 1,500
¶285Swan Lake Llamas 5,750 0 5,750
¶286Sea World of Ohio 1,500 0 1,500
¶287Society Bank 5,750 ($ 5,750) 0
¶288Bank One 200 (200) 0
¶289Sea World of Ohio 1,500 0 1,500
¶290Sea World of Ohio 1,500 0 1,500
¶291Sea World of Ohio 1,500 0 1,500
¶292Sea World of Ohio 5,000 *439 0 5,000
¶293Jerome T. Grone 2,500 0 2,500
¶294Sea World of Ohio 1,500 0 1,500
¶295Sunny Hill Farm 1,500 0 1,500
¶296John C. Gifford 100 0 100
¶297Sunny Hill Farm 13,500 0 13,500
¶298Piccolo Company 10,000 (10,000) 0
¶299John C. Gifford 1,100 0 1,100
¶300John C. Gifford 7,300 0 7,300
¶301Custom Parrot
¶302Network 3,500 (3,500) 0
¶303Dollar Bank
¶304Cashier Check 15,000 (15,000) 0
¶305 ______ _________ ______
¶306 Total 82,200 (34,450) 47,750
¶308 1989 Gross Receipts
¶309As Stated in Notice of Deficiency n1 Concessions Total
¶310_________________________________ ___________ _____
¶311 Payor Amount
¶312 _____ ______
¶313Llamas of Michigan $ 2,450 0 $ 2,450
¶314Llamas of Michigan 22,050 0 22,050
¶315Dennis Grodings 900 0 900
¶316Sea World of Ohio 1,500 0 1,500
¶317John C. Gifford 9,500 0 9,500
¶318Sea World of Ohio 1,500 0 1,500
¶319Sea World of Ohio 105 0 105
¶320Sea World of Ohio 1,500 0 1,500
¶321John C. Gifford 1,200 0 1,200
¶322Sea World of Ohio 1,500 0 *441 1,500
¶323State of Ohio 3,649 0 3,649
¶324Valley Las Vegas 1,815 ($ 1,815) 0
¶325Ronald G. DeRhodes 22,000 0 22,000
¶326Canton Veterinary
¶327Hospital 5,000 0 5,000
¶328Sea World of Ohio 3,000 0 3,000
¶329Wendy H. Arbogast 1,800 0 1,800
¶330Constance A. Halle 150 0 150
¶331William C. Crawford 200 0 200
¶332William C. Crawford 1,000 0 1,000
¶333Sea World of Ohio 1,500 0 1,500
¶334Sea World of Ohio 1,500 0 1,500
¶335Sea World of Ohio 1,500 0 1,500
¶336Ronald C. Blidar 1,800 0 1,800
¶337Ronald C. Blidar 1,000 0 *442 1,000
¶338Sea World of Ohio 1,500 0 1,500
¶339John C. Gifford 600 0 600
¶340 ______ _________ _______
¶341 Total 90,219 (1,815) 88,404
¶342 APPENDIX C
¶343 1990 Gross Receipts
¶344As Stated in Notice of Deficiency Concessions Total
¶345_________________________________ ___________ _____
¶346 Payor Amount
¶347 _____ ______
¶348John C. Gifford 9,500 0 $ 9,500
¶349Educational
¶350 Zoological
¶351 Programs, Inc. 100 0 100
¶352Kerney L. Martini 8,500 0 8,500
¶353Scavenger Oil Corp. 1,800 ($ 1,800) 0
¶354Sea World of Ohio 1,500 0 1,500
¶355Kerney L. Martini *443 7,500 0 7,500
¶356Intuit 2 0 2
¶357Sea World of Ohio 1,500 0 1,500
¶358Educational
¶359 Zoological
¶360 Programs, Inc. 350 0 350
¶361Sea World of Ohio 1,500 0 1,500
¶362Sea World of Ohio 1,200 0 1,200
¶363Sea World of Ohio 1,500 0 1,500
¶364Wendy H. Arbogast 200 0 200
¶365Educational
¶366 Zoological
¶367 Programs Inc. 100 0 100
¶368Sea World of Ohio 1,500 0 1,500
¶369Sea World of Ohio 1,500 0 1,500
¶370Robert Sabo 145 0 145
¶371Sea World of Ohio 1,500 0 1,500
¶372Ronald G. DeRhodes 1,200 *444 0 1,200
¶373State of Ohio 728 0 728
¶374Wendy H. Arbogast 1,800 0 1,800
¶375Sea World of Ohio 1,500 0 1,500
¶376Sea World of Ohio 1,500 0 1,500
¶377Robert Sabo 135 0 135
¶378Robert Sabo 210 0 210
¶379Sea World of Ohio 1,500 0 1,500
¶380Educational
¶381 Zoological
¶382 Programs, Inc. 100 0 100
¶383William Boever 15,500 0 15,500
¶384Robert Sabo 90 0 90
¶385Sea World of Ohio 1,500 0 1,500
¶386Sea World of Ohio 1,500 0 1,500
¶387Sea World of Ohio 9,000 0 9,000
¶388 Total*4451 76,160 (1,800) 74,360
¶389 1990 Royalty Income
¶390 Payor Amount Concessions Total
¶391 _____ ______ ___________ ______
¶392Scavenger Oil Corp. 1 $ 1,800 $ 0 $ 1,800
¶393Pennzoil Products 257 0 257
¶394Pennzoil Products 289 0 289
¶395Pennzoil Products 443 0 443
¶396 ______ _______ _______
¶397 Total 2,789 0 2,789
¶398 ______ _______ _______
¶399*446 Total Income 2 78,949 (1,800) 77,149
¶400 APPENDIX D
¶401 1991 Gross Receipts
¶402As Stated in Notice of Deficiency Concessions Total
¶403_________________________________ *447 ___________ _____
¶404 Payor Amount
¶405 _____ ______
¶406Robert Sabo $ 600 0 $ 600
¶407Robert Sabo 70 0 70
¶408Robert Sabo 35 0 35
¶409Fish and Feathers
¶410International 250 0 250
¶411Robert Sabo 1,000 0 1,000
¶412Robert Sabo 500 0 500
¶413Bad Film 10,500 ($ 10,500) 0
¶414Educational
¶415 Zoological
¶416 Programs Inc. 200 0 200
¶417State of Ohio 1,000 0 1,000
¶418Robert Sabo 35 0 35
¶419Robert Sabo 123 0 123
¶420Avian Farms 2,750 0 *448 2,750
¶421Mary Z. Reed 500 0 500
¶422Avian Farms 35 0 35
¶423ITT Hartford 595 0 595
¶424Robert Sabo 66 0 66
¶425Avian Farms 1,000 0 1,000
¶426Sea World of Ohio 1,800 0 1,800
¶427Avian Farms 1,000 0 1,000
¶428Mary Z. Reed 1,500 0 1,500
¶429Sea World of Ohio 1,800 0 1,800
¶430Sea World of Ohio 1,200 0 1,200
¶431 ________ __________ ______
¶432 Total 26,559 (10,500) 16,059
¶433 1991 Royalty Income
¶434 Payor Amount Concessions Total
¶435*449 _____ ______ ___________ _____
¶436Pennzoil Products $ 249 $ 0 $ 249
¶437Pennzoil Products 209 0 209
¶438Pennzoil Products 241 0 241
¶439Pennzoil Products 337 0 337
¶440Pennzoil Products 217 0 217
¶441Pennzoil Products 578 0 578
¶442Pennzoil Products 369 0 369
¶443Total 2,199 0 2,199
¶444 ______ ________ ______
¶445 Total Income 1 28,758 (10,500) 18,258
¶447 1992 Gross Receipts
¶448As Stated in Notice of Deficiency Concessions Total
¶449_________________________________ ___________ _____
¶450 Payor Amount
¶451 _____ ______
¶452Educational
¶453 Zoological
¶454 Programs, Inc. $ 100 0 $ 100
¶455Anheuser-Busch 2,000 0 2,000
¶456Anheuser-Busch 2,700 0 2,700
¶457Anheuser-Busch 1,400 0 1,400
¶458Timothy L. Charles 500 0 500
¶459Anheuser-Busch 1,400 0 1,400
¶460Avian Farms 560 0 560
¶461Avian Farms 350 0 350
¶462Avian Farms 70 0 70
¶463Anheuser-Busch 1,600 0 1,600
¶464Anheuser-Busch*451 1,200 0 1,200
¶465Anheuser-Busch 1,200 0 1,200
¶466Anheuser-Busch 1,200 0 1,200
¶467Cortland Savings
¶468Bank 391 ($ 391) 0
¶469Anheuser-Busch 1,200 0 1,200
¶470Anheuser-Busch 1,200 0 1,200
¶471Anheuser-Busch 1,200 0 1,200
¶472 ______ _______ _______
¶473 Total 8,271 (391) 17,880
¶474 1992 Royalty Income
¶475 Payor Amount Concessions Total
¶476 _____ ______ ___________ _____
¶477Pennzoil Products $ 155 $ 0 $ 155
¶478Pennzoil Products 281 0 281
¶479Pennzoil Products *452 257 0 257
¶480Pennzoil Products 332 0 332
¶481Pennzoil Products 745 0 745
¶482Pennzoil Products 432 0 432
¶483 ________ ______ _______
¶484Total 2,203 0 2,203
¶485 ________ ______ _______
¶486 Total Income 1 20,474 (391) 20,083
¶487 APPENDIX F
¶488 1988 Gross Receipts
¶489 Deposited in
¶490 Payor Amount Payee Account No.
¶491*453 _____ ______ _____ ____________
¶492Sea World of Ohio $ 500 Dr. Temple
¶493Sea World of Ohio 500 Dr. Temple
¶494Sea World of Ohio 1,000 Dr. Temple
¶495Sea World of Ohio 1,500 Dr. Temple
¶496Swan Lake Llamas 5,750 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶497Sea World of Ohio 1,500 Dr. Temple
¶498Sea World of Ohio 1,500 Dr. Temple
¶499Sea World of Ohio 1,500 Dr. Temple
¶500Sea World of Ohio 1,500 Dr. Temple
¶501Sea World of Ohio 5,000 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶502Jerome T. Grone 2,500 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶503Sea World of Ohio 1,500 Dr. Temple
¶504Sunny Hill Farm 1,500 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶505John C. Gifford 100 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶506Sunny Hill Farm 13,500 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶507John C. Gifford 1,100 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶508John C. Gifford 7,300 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶509 _______
¶510 Total 47,750
¶512 1989 Gross Receipts
¶513 Deposited in
¶514 Payor Amount Payee Account No.
¶515 _____ ______ _____ ____________
¶516Llamas of Michigan $ 2,450 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶517Llamas of Michigan 22,050 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶518Dennis Grodings 900 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶519Sea World of Ohio 1,500 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶520John C. Gifford 9,500 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶521Sea World of Ohio 1,500 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶522Sea World of Ohio 105 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶523Sea World of Ohio 1,500 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶524John C. Gifford 1,200 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶525Sea World of Ohio 1,500 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶526State of Ohio 3,649 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶527Ronald*455 G. DeRhodes 22,000 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶528Canton Veterinary
¶529Hospital 5,000 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶530Sea World of Ohio 3,000 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶531Wendy H. Arbogast 1,800 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶532Constance A. Halle 150 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶533William C. Crawford 200 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶534William C. Crawford 1,000 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶535Sea World of Ohio 1,500 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶536Sea World of Ohio 1,500 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶537Sea World of Ohio 1,500 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶538Ronald C. Blidar 1,800 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶539Ronald C. Blidar 1,000 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶540Sea World of Ohio 1,500 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶541John C. Gifford 600 Galingale Group 400359863
¶542 _______
¶543 Total 88,404
¶544 APPENDIX H
¶546 Deposited in
¶547 Payor Amount Payee Account No.
¶548 _____ ______ _____ ____________
¶549John C. Gifford $ 9,500 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶550Educational
¶551 Zoological
¶552 Programs, Inc. 100 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶553Kerney L. Martini 8,500 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶554Sea World of Ohio 1,500 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶555Kerney L. Martini 7,500 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶556Intuit 2 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶557Sea World of Ohio 1,500 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶558Educational
¶559 Zoological
¶560 Programs, Inc. 350 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶561Sea World of Ohio 1,500 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶562Sea World of Ohio 1,200 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶563Sea World of Ohio 1,500 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶564Wendy*457 H. Arbogast 200 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶565Educational
¶566 Zoological
¶567 Programs Inc. 100 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶568Sea World of Ohio 1,500 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶569Sea World of Ohio 1,500 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶570Robert Sabo 145 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶571Sea World of Ohio 1,500 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶572Ronald G. DeRhodes 1,200 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶573State of Ohio 728 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶574Wendy H. Arbogast 1,800 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶575Sea World of Ohio 1,500 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶576Sea World of Ohio 1,500 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶577Robert Sabo 135 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶578Robert Sabo 210 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶579Sea World of Ohio 1,500 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶580Educational
¶581 Zoological
¶582 Programs, Inc. 100 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶583William Boever *458 15,500 Galingale Llamas 1 400359863
¶584Robert Sabo 90 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶585Sea World of Ohio 1,500 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶586Sea World of Ohio 1,500 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶587Sea World of Ohio 9,000 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶588 _______
¶589 Total 74,360
¶590 1990 Royalty Income
¶591 Deposited in
¶592 Payor Amount Payee Account No.
¶593 _____ _______ _____ ____________
¶594Scavenger Oil Corp. $ 1,800 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶595Pennzoil Products 257 Trundle Management
¶597 Ltd. Trustee 1 1163506106
¶598Pennzoil Products 289 Trundle Management
¶599 Eton Trust Co.,
¶600 Ltd. Trustee 1163506106
¶601Pennzoil Products 443 Trundle Management
¶602 Eton Trust Co.,
¶603 Ltd. Trustee 1163506106
¶604 ________
¶605 Total 2,789
¶606 ________
¶608 APPENDIX I
¶609 1991 Gross Receipts
¶611 Payor Amount Payee Account No.
¶612 _____ ______ _____ ____________
¶613Robert Sabo $ 600 Wendy Arbogast 400359855
¶614Robert Sabo 70 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶615Robert Sabo 35 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶616Fish and Feathers
¶617International 250 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶618Robert Sabo 1,000 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶619Robert Sabo 500 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶620Educational
¶621 Zoological
¶622 Programs, Inc. 200 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶623State of Ohio 1,000 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶624Robert Sabo 35 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶625Robert Sabo 123 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶626Avian Farms 2,750 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶627Mary Z. Reed 500 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶628Avian*461 Farms 35 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶629ITT Hartford 595 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶630Robert Sabo 66 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶631Avian Farms 1,000 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶632Sea World of Ohio 1,800 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶633Avian Farms 1,000 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶634Mary Z. Reed 1,500 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶635Sea World of Ohio 1,800 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶636Sea World of Ohio 1,200 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶637 ______
¶638 Total 16,059
¶639 1991 Royalty Income
¶640 Deposited in
¶641 Payor Amount Payee Account No.
¶642 _____ ______ ______ ____________
¶643Pennzoil Products $ 249 Trundle Management
¶645 Ltd., Trustee 1 1163506106
¶646Pennzoil Products 209 Trundle Management
¶647 Eton Trust Co.,
¶648 Ltd., Trustee 1163506106
¶649Pennzoil Products 241 Trundle Management
¶650 Eton Trust Co.,
¶651 Ltd., Trustee 1163506106
¶652Pennzoil Products 337 Trundle Management
¶653 Eton Trust Co.,
¶654 Ltd., Trustee 1163506106
¶655Pennzoil Products 217 Trundle Management
¶656 Eton Trust Co.,
¶657 Ltd., Trustee 1163506106
¶658Pennzoil Products 578 Trundle Management
¶659 Eton Trust Co.,
¶660 Ltd., Trustee 1163506106
¶661Pennzoil Products *463 369 Trundle Management
¶662 Eton Trust Co.,
¶663 Ltd., Trustee 1163506106
¶664 _______
¶665 Total 2,199
¶666 _______
¶668 APPENDIX J
¶669 1992 Gross Receipts
¶670 Deposited in
¶671 Payor Amount Payee Account No.
¶672 _____ ______ _____ ____________
¶673Educational
¶674 Zoological
¶675 Programs, Inc. $ 100 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶676Anheuser-Busch*464 2,000 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶677Anheuser-Busch 2,700 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶678Anheuser-Busch 1,400 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶679Timothy L. Charles 500 Galingale Group 400359863
¶680Anheuser-Busch 1,400 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶681Avian Farms 560 Galingale Group 400359863
¶682Avian Farms 350 Galingale Group 400359863
¶683Avian Farms 70 Plume Enterprises 400359855
¶684Anheuser-Busch 1,600 Plume Enterprises 23-043-10
¶685Anheuser-Busch 1,200 Plume Enterprises 23-043-10
¶686Anheuser-Busch 1,200 Plume Enterprises 23-043-10
¶687Anheuser-Busch 1,200 Plume Enterprises 23-043-10
¶688Anheuser-Busch 1,200 Plume Enterprises 23-043-10
¶689Anheuser-Busch 1,200 Plume Enterprises 23-043-10
¶690Anheuser-Busch 1,200 Plume Enterprises 23-043-10
¶691 ______
¶693 1992 Royalty Income
¶694 Deposited in
¶695 Payor Amount Payee Account No.
¶696 _____ ______ _____ ____________
¶697Pennzoil Products $ 155 Trundle Management
¶698 Eton Trust Co.,
¶699 Ltd., Trustee 1 1163506106
¶700Pennzoil Products 281 Trundle Management
¶701 Eton Trust Co.,
¶702 Ltd., Trustee 1163506106
¶703Pennzoil Products 257 Trundle Management
¶704 Eton Trust Co.,
¶705 Ltd., Trustee 1163506106
¶706Pennzoil Products 332 Trundle Management
¶707 Eton Trust Co.,
¶708 Ltd., Trustee 1163506106
¶709Pennzoil*466 Products 745 Trundle Management
¶710 Eton Trust Co.,
¶711 Ltd., Trustee 1163506106
¶712Pennzoil Products 432 Trundle Management
¶713 Eton Trust Co.,
¶714 Ltd., Trustee 1163506106
¶715 ______
¶716Total 2,203
Footnotes
¶7181. Respondent concedes the following amounts of income set forth in the computation of petitioner's gross receipts from veterinary services and the sale of animals in the statutory notice of deficiency: $ 34,450 in 1988 (see appendix A); $ 1,815 in 1989 (see appendix B); $ 1,800 in 1990 (see appendix C); $ 10,500 in 1991 (see appendix D); and $ 391 in 1992 (see appendix E).↩
¶7192. Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.↩
¶74817. We note that petitioner's attorney Frank R. Bodor was the taxpayer, along with his wife Gina Bodor, in Bodor v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 1993-456, affd. without published opinion 52 F.3d 324↩ (6th Cir. 1995). In that case, this Court found that Robert Temple signed checks for an entity created and operated by Mr. and Mrs. Bodor pursuant to a plan to create tiered structures of domestic and foreign trust shell entities to disguise the fact that Mr. and Mrs. Bodor or their minor children still owned property.
¶75220. Nassau Life Insurance Co. was an entity which assisted taxpayers to avoid the payment and collection of their Federal income taxes. See Boyce v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 1990-658, affd. without published opinion 955 F.2d 47 (9th Cir. 1992); see also Para Techs. Trust v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 1992-575; and Johnson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 1989-591. Due to illegal activities and a "tax situation", Nassau Life Insurance Co. ceased operations. See Bodor v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 1993-456↩.
¶75523. The timing of the transfer is similar to the facts in Bodor v. Commissioner, supra.↩ The taxpayer in that case was Frank R. Bodor. He is the attorney representing petitioner in the present case. In Bodor, we found that the taxpayer transferred his interest in eight properties by quitclaim to various foreign entities for which Nassau Life Insurance Co. served as trustee, that due to illegal activities in late 1986 or early 1987, Nassau Life ceased operations, and that Mr. Bodor knew that the problems stemmed from illegal activities and a "tax situation".
¶76932. Additional checks totaling $ 825 were used to pay L. R. Mayer ($ 125), Control Management ($ 400), and McMeyers & Ford ($ 300). We believe these expenses were incurred, in part, to maintain the appearance of a valid trust arrangement. Most of the remaining funds were spent on travel expenses.↩
¶77033. Sec. 6653(b)(1) provides, in part:
¶771SEC. 6653(b) Fraud.--
¶772(1) In General. -- If any part of any underpayment … of tax required to be shown on a return is due to fraud, there shall be added to the tax an amount equal to 75 percent of the portion of the underpayment which is attributable to fraud.↩
¶77334. Sec. 6651(f) provides:
¶774SEC. 6651(f) Increase in Penalty for Fraudulent Failure to File. -- If any failure to file any return is fraudulent, paragraph (1) of subsection (a) shall be applied --
¶775(1) by substituting "15 percent" for "5 percent" each place it appears, and
¶776(2) by substituting "75 percent" for "25 percent".
¶777Sec. 6651(a)(1) provides in relevant part:
¶778SEC. 6651. FAILURE TO FILE TAX RETURN OR TO PAY TAX.
¶779(a) addition to the Tax. -- In case of failure --
¶780(1) to file any return required under authority of subchapter A of chapter 61 … on the date prescribed therefore (determined with regard to any extension of time for filing), unless it is shown that such failure is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect, there shall be added to the amount required to be shown as tax on such return 5 percent of the amount of such tax if the failure is for not more than 1 month, with an additional 5 percent for each additional month or fraction thereof during which such failure continues, not exceeding 25 percent in the aggregate;↩
¶7871. On some checks, more than one party is listed on a payor's check (i.e., John and Maria Gifford). We note, that in some instances, respondent may list one payor (i.e., John Gifford) as the payor when in fact it was the other party, presumably his spouse (i.e., Maria Gifford) who signed the check. These differences haveno impact on our decision, and for consistency, we use only the name of the party used by respondent in the notice of deficiency throughout these appendixes.↩
¶7891. Respondent originally included payment from Scavenger Oil in its computation of petitioner's gross receipts from the sale of animals and for royalty income. In respondent's concessions, the double counting of this one check was eliminated. We note that the record is not clear on whether the payment was for the purchase of an animal or for royalty payments. Nevertheless, it is clear that petitioner received an $ 1,800 payment from Scavenger Oil in 1990. Whether the check represents payment for the purchase of an animal or royalty income has no bearing on the outcome of this case. In either case, it is taxable income to petitioner as ordinary income.↩