Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2000 UT 34 - State v. Bennett

State v. Bennett’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2020

10 state decisions

60200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chess v. Smith · Bennett v. Holden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[tJhe prejudicial effect that flows from a defendant's appearing before a jury in identifiable prison garb is not measurable, and it is so potentially prejudicial as to create a substantial risk of fundamental unfairness in a criminal trial”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"a trial judge should on his own initiative inquire of a defendant whether he wishes to waive his right not to appear in prison clothes so that the record affirmatively shows an intelligent and conscious waiver by the defendant if the defendant chooses to stand trial in prison clothes."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “mandates reversal of [defendant's] conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.