State v. Kohl’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
69 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently October 2025 · most notably State v. Calliham (2002), State v. Lafferty (2001)
69 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Estelle v. Williams · State v. Pena · State v. Dunn · State v. Hamilton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under the cumulative error doctrine, we will reverse only if the cumulative effect of the several errors undermines our confidence ... that a fair trial was had.”
13 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Diaz · State v. Wright“We will reverse an erroneous evidentiary ruling only if, absent the error, there is a reasonable likelihood that there would have been a more favorable result for the defendant.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“'is substantial and prejudicial such that there is a reasonable likelihood that, in its absence, there would have been a more favorable result.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.