Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2000 UT 38 - State v. Tunzi

State v. Tunzi’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 2024

4 state decisions

20200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he burdens and futility associated with reconstructing a record are increased exponentially when the issue on appeal concerns the sufficiency of the evidence supporting a conviction. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.