Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2000 UT 42 - State v. Adams

State v. Adams’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2024

24 state decisions

100200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Dunn · State v. Knight · State v. Rimmasch · State v. Larsen · State v. Workman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “permits testimony concerning a witness's general character or reputation for truthfulness or untruthfulness but prohibits any testimony as to a witness's truthfulness on a particular occasion.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “does not prohibit an expert ... from giving testimony from which a jury could infer the veracity of the witness.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a sufficiently high likelihood of a different result such that our confidence in the outcome is undermined.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.