Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2000 UT 44 - State v. Gamblin

State v. Gamblin’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably 438 Main Street v. Easy Heat, Inc. (2004), State v. Dean (2004)

37 state decisions

260200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Valcarce v. Fitzgerald · State v. Jaeger · Willey v. Willey · State v. Kay · State v. Gallegos

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To successfully challenge a trial court's findings, an appellant must first marshal all the evidence that supports the trial court's findings. After marshaling the supportive evidence, the appellant then must show that, even when viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the trial court's ruling, the evidence is insufficient to support the trial court's findings.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[Wle are not obligated to strike or disregard a marginal or inadequate brief, and in this case we choose to further address defendant's arguments in the interests of justice.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “this court is not a depository in which the appealing party may dump the burden of argument and research.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.