State v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently April 2021
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Dunn · State v. Hamilton · State v. James · 76 Wash. 2d 398 - Johnston v. Ohls · State v. McCumber
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the error should have been obvious to the trial court”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Garcia · J.C. v. State“'if the challenged act or omission might be considered sound trial strategy, we will not find that it demonstrates inadequacy of counsel.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The prejudice test for ineffective assistance of counsel claims is equivalent to the harmfulness test applied in assessing plain error.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Ott · State v. Hall
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.