Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2000 UT 56 - State v. Burns

State v. Burns’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
9
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

54 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Ake v. Oklahoma · Evitts v. Lucey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Olur primary goal in interpreting statutes is to give effect to the legislative intent, as evidenced by the plain language, in light of the purpose the statute was meant to achieve.”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “mandate the packaging of indigent assistance”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “prosecute other remedies before or after a conviction, considered by defense counsel to be in the interest of justice except for other and subsequent discretionary appeals or discretionary writ proceedings.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.