Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2000 UT 62 - State v. Veteto

State v. Veteto’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Pena · State v. Brown · State v. Kohl · State v. Lopes · State v. Jaeger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any alleged inaccuracies in the [PSI], which have not been resolved by the parties and the department prior to sentencing, shall be brought to the attention of the sentencing judge, and the judge may grant an additional ten working days to resolve the alleged inaccuracies of the report with the department. If after ten working days the inaccuracies cannot be resolved, the court shall make a determination of relevance and accuracy on the record.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “conclusions of law based on these findings for correctness.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “''Whether the trial court properly complied with a legal duty to resolve on the record the accuracy of contested information in sentencing reports is a question of law that we review for correctness.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.