Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2000 UT 68 - State v. Reed

State v. Reed’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
2
states following
January 2026
most recently cited

41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently January 2026 · most notably State v. Killpack (2008), State v. Fedorowicz (2002)

41 state decisions

190200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Bishop · State v. James · State v. Shickles · State v. Saunders · State v. Decorso

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “evidence of multiple acts of similar or identical abuse is unlikely to prejudice a jury”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “We review rulings on motions for a mistrial based on prosecutorial misconduct for abuse of discretion.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Prosecutorial misconduct occurs when the prosecutor's comments call the jurors' attention to matters not proper for their consideration and when the comments have a reasonable likelihood of prejudicing the jury by significantly influencing its verdict.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.