Lund v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
1 district · 27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably Menzies v. Galetka (2006), Archuleta v. Galetka (2011)
1 district · 27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362
Relies on New York Life Insurance v. Brown · United States v. Rawlings · Leon Schwab v. Bullock's Inc., a Corporation · 14 Utah 2d 52 - Mayhew v. Standard Gilsonite Company · Katz v. Pierce
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] trial court's discretion should be exercised in furtherance of justice and should incline towards granting relief in a doubtful case to the end that the party may have a hearing.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“As a threshold matter, a court's ruling must be 'based on adequate findings of fact' and 'on the law'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A decision premised on flawed legal conclusions, for instance, constitutes an abuse of discretion.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.