Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2000 UT 76 - State v. Litherland

State v. Litherland’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

180
cited by 180 later decisions
3
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

175 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 180 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably State v. Winfield (2006), State v. Bond (2015)

175 state decisions

1120200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Batson v. Kentucky · Pennsylvania v. Finley · Michel v. State of Louisiana Poret · JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TB

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 180 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that counsel's performance was deficient, in that it fell below an objective standard of reasonable professional judgment”
    37 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “that counsel's deficient performance was prejudicial-i.e., that it affected the outcome of the case.”
    22 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “rebut the strong presumption that under the cireumstances, the challenged action might be considered sound trial strategy.”
    20 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.