Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2000 UT 91 - Young v. State

Young v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

1 district · 16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ong International (U.S.A.) Inc. v. 11th Avenue Corp. · Frampton v. Wilson · Pennington v. Allstate Insurance Co. · Bd. of Com'rs, Utah State Bar v. Petersen · Highland Construction Co. v. Union Pacific Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'trial court is persuaded that [the depositions]! were taken in good faith and, in the light of the cireumstances, appeared to be essential for the development and presentation of the case'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'[A] trial court's decision to award the prevailing party its costs will be reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'[Aloy amount paid [for a witness] over the statutory allowance is an expense of litigation rather than a taxable cost, and not recoverable.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.