State v. Floyd’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably State v. Richard J. Sulla (2016), State v. Schaefer (2008)
38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 115 Wis. 2d 371 - State v. Gilbert · 213 Wis. 2d 488 - State v. Castillo · 46 Wis. 2d 151 - Embry v. State · 75 Wis. 2d 244 - Klimas v. State · 144 Wis. 2d 86 - State v. Boettcher
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A convicted offender shall be given credit toward the service of his or her sentence for all days spent in custody in connection with the course of conduct for which sentence was imposed. As used in this subsection, "actual days spent in custody" includes, without limitation by enumeration, confinement related to an offense for which the offender is ultimately sentenced, or for any other sentence arising out of the same course of conduct, which occurs: 1. While the offender is awaiting trial; 2. While the offender is being tried; and 3. While the offender is awaiting imposition of sentence after trial.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“[The defendant] is not sentenced on these read-in charges, but these admitted, uncharged offenses are considered in sentencing him or her on the charged offense.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[r]ead-ins constitute admissions by the defendant to those charges”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.