State v. Martwick’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 87 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably United States v. Johnson (2001), State v. Eason (2001)
2 federal appellate · 87 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ornelas v. United States · Boyd v. United States · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Smith v. Maryland · Soberon v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he right of the People to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“are useful analytical tools only to the degree that, in any given case, they bear upon the centrally relevant consideration — whether the area in question is so intimately tied to the home itself that it should be placed under the home's 'umbrella' of Fourth Amendment protection.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“`one whose determination is decisive of constitutional rights.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Weed · State v. Dagnall
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.