Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2000 WI 58 - State v. Richter

State v. Richter’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

74
cited by 74 later decisions
3
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

72 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably State v. Artic (2010), State v. Ferguson (2009)

72 state decisions

380200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Payton v. New York · Brown v. Illinois · Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden · Illinois v. Rodriguez · Welsh v. Wisconsin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There are four well-recognized categories of exigent circumstances that have been held to authorize a law enforcement officer's warrantless entry into a home: 1) hot pursuit of a suspect, 2) a threat to the safety of a suspect or others, 3) a risk that evidence will be destroyed, and 4) a likelihood that the suspect will flee.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “immediate or continuous pursuit of [a suspect] from the scene of a crime.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'[w]hether a police officer under the circumstances known to the officer at the time [of entry] reasonably believes that delay in procuring a warrant would gravely endanger life or risk destruction of evidence or greatly enhance the likelihood of the suspect's escape.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.