State v. Huebner’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
125 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 129 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably State v. Ndina (2009), Village of Trempealeau v. Mikrut (2004)
125 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Olano · Griffith v. Kentucky · Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois · Freytag v. Commissioner · Williams v. Florida
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 129 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is a fundamental principle of appellate review that issues must be preserved at the circuit court.”
29 later decisions quote this exact passage“Whereas forfeiture is the failure to make the timely assertion of a right, waiver is the intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“because it refers to the forfeiture of a right by silence rather than the intentional relinquishment of a known right.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.