State v. Bollig’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 110 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 120 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably United States v. Moreno (2006), State v. Smith (2010)
4 federal appellate · 110 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 14071 (§ 170101 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994)
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Brady v. United States · State v. Cook · Doe v. Poritz · 131 Wis. 2d 246 - State v. Bangert
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 120 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a definite, immediate, and largely automatic effect”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“to protect the public and assist law enforcement.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“[A trial] court should freely allow a defendant to withdraw his plea prior to sentencing for any fair and just reason, unless the prosecution will be substantially prejudiced.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jenkins · State v. Jenkins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.