Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2000 WI 72 - State v. Griffith

State v. Griffith’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
6
states following
July 2021
most recently cited

58 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably State v. Eason (2001), State v. Kramer (2009)

58 state decisions

410200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Florida v. Royer · United States v. Mendenhall · Delaware v. Prouse

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The question [of] whether police conduct violated the constitutional guarantee against unreasonable searches and seizures is a question of constitutional fact”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When a Fourth Amendment challenge is raised at the trial court level, the trial court considers the evidence, makes findings of evidentiary or historical fact, and then resolves the issue by applying constitutional principles to those historical facts.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated; and no warrant shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.