Yahnke v. Carson’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 53 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Lambrecht v. Estate of Kaczmarczyk (2001), Lodl v. Progressive Northern Insurance (2002)
2 federal appellate · 53 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 89 Wis. 2d 555 - Kraemer Bros. v. United States Fire Insurance · 40 Wis. 2d 627 - Zimmer v. Daun · 30 Wis. 2d 534 - Leszczynski v. Surges · 227 Wis. 2d 531 - Jandrt Ex Rel. Brueggeman v. Jerome Foods, Inc. · 93 Wis. 2d 552 - Nelson v. Albrechtson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is unwise because it puts the court into the position of weighing the evidence and choosing between competing reasonable inferences, a task heretofore prohibited on summary judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.