Seider v. O'CONNELL’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 266 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 281 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County (2004), Wisconsin Citizens Concerned for Cranes & Doves v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (2004)
4 federal appellate · 266 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue · Train v. Colorado Public Interest Research Group, Inc. · 201 Wis. 2d 274 - UFE Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review Commission · 94 Wis. 2d 106 - Nottelson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations · 211 Wis. 2d 397 - State v. Setagord
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 281 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[S]tatutory interpretation 'begins with the language of the statute. If the meaning of the statute is plain, we ordinarily stop the inquiry.'”
47 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“begins with the language of the statute.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“No agency may promulgate a rule which conflicts with state law.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.