State v. Pallone’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
78
cited by 78 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
July 2018
most recently cited
76 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Illinois v. Gates · Katz v. United States · Carroll v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and art. I, § 11 of the Wisconsin Constitution both protect citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“State bears the burden of proving that a warrantless search falls under one of the established exceptions [to the requirement of a warrant].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he right of the People to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Matejka · State v. Malone
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.