Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2000 WI 92 - State v. Hammer

State v. Hammer’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 44 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Alaska · Chambers v. Mississippi · 115 Wis. 2d 334 - State v. Pharr · 34 Wis. 2d 278 - Whitty v. State · 216 Wis. 2d 768 - State v. Sullivan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the state must prove an element of a crime, then evidence relevant to that element is admissible, even if a defendant does not dispute the element.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “has a tendency to make a consequential fact more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “and the same evidence may fall into more than one exception.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.