State v. Bond’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Rhode Island v. Innis · 124 Wis. 2d 525 - State v. Dyess · State Ex Rel. Goodchild v. Burke · 227 Wis. 2d 758 - State v. Erickson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“about Bond and he should have known his words were reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response. Id., ¶ 17. Third, we inquired as to whether an impartial observer would perceive the officer's intent to be to elicit a response from Bond and decided it was so. Id., ¶ 18. Fourth, we observed that the officer's words were provocative and”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“any words or actions on the part of the police (other than those normally attendant to arrest and custody) that the police should know are reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“whether an objective observer could foresee that the officer's conduct or words would elicit an incriminating response.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.