2000 WI App 123 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
July 2013
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · North Carolina v. Alford · 153 Wis. 2d 121 - State v. Johnson · 207 Wis. 2d 258 - State v. Smith · 219 Wis. 2d 615 - State Ex Rel. Warren v. Schwarz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court shall examine on oath each person who is called as a juror to discover whether the juror is related by blood, marriage or adoption to any party or to any attorney appearing in the case, or has any financial interest in the case, or has expressed or formed any opinion, or is aware of any bias or prejudice in the case. If a juror is not indifferent in the case, the juror shall be excused.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A defendant's failure to make a satisfactory showing on one or more of the three considerations is grounds for denying his or her motion for a continuance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he trial court ultimately bears the responsibility for ensuring that a fair and impartial jury is impaneled.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.