2000 WI App 158 - State v. Olson’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 227 Wis. 2d 357 - Reyes v. Greatway Insurance Co. · 175 Wis. 2d 628 - State v. Olson · 122 Wis. 2d 389 - State v. Gavigan · 139 Wis. 2d 171 - State v. McKenzie · 170 Wis. 2d 393 - State v. Traylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“allowed” — that is, consciously and affirmatively consented to — the contact before an inference could be drawn that he (or she) intended sexual gratification or arousal. We believe a similar requirement is implicit in the sexual-intercourse-with-a-child statute — a requirement that the intercourse must at least have occurred, in the language of Wis. Stat. § 948.01 (6) and Wis. JI-Criminal 2104 and 2101B,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Steffes v. Pollard
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.