State v. Evans’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably 2002 WI App 166 - State v. Johnson (2002), Olivarez v. Unitrin Property & Casualty Insurance (2006)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Desmond v. New Valley Corp. · 40 Wis. 2d 79 - Ramer v. State · United States v. Jackson · 219 Wis. 2d 481 - State v. Ferron · 219 Wis. 2d 516 - State v. Cardenas-Hernandez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]here a state rule mirrors the federal rule, we consider federal cases interpreting the rule to be persuasive authority.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“Restitution is governed by Wis. Stat. § 973.20 , which requires courts to order full or partial restitution 'under this section' to any victim of a crime 'unless the court finds substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ziegler · State v. Krohn“At the request of a party the court shall order witnesses excluded so that they cannot hear the testimony of other witnesses, and it may make the order of its own motion. This rule does not authorize exclusion of... a person whose presence is shown by a party to be essential to the presentation of the party's cause ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Copeland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.