2000 WI App 184 - State v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 2 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1144 (§ 514 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)
Relies on Pilot Life Insurance v. Dedeaux · Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendon · New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers Insurance · California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Construction, N. A. · Massachusetts v. Morash
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We hold that there is a conflict, which suffices to resolve the case. We need not inquire whether the statutory phrase 'relate to' provides further and additional support for the pre-emption claim. Nor need we consider the applicability of field pre-emption.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“upon ERISA plans, or where the existence of ERISA plans is essential to the law's operation, that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“is not self-defining, and the Supreme Court”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.