State v. Oswald’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently March 2016
3 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Irvin v. Dowd · 153 Wis. 2d 493 - State v. Poellinger · 124 Wis. 2d 628 - State v. Pitsch · 153 Wis. 2d 121 - State v. Johnson · 44 Cal. 3d 883 - People v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A prospective juror is subjectively biased if the record reflects that the juror is not a reasonable person who is sincerely willing to set aside any opinion or prior knowledge that the prospective juror might have.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Ajuror who 'has expressed or formed any opinion, or is aware of any bias or prejudice in the case' should be removed from the panel.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Subjective bias refers to the prospective juror's state of mind.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.