2000 WI App 201 - Lenhardt v. Lenhardt’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 113 Wis. 2d 61 - Sweet v. Berge · 197 Wis. 2d 973 - Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp. · 122 Wis. 2d 503 - Stoll v. Adriansen · 185 Wis. 2d 220 - Stern v. Thompson & Coates, Ltd. · 83 Wis. 2d 58 - Edlin v. Soderstrom
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Costs upon frivolous claims and counterclaims. (1) If an action or special proceeding commenced or continued by a plaintiff or a counterclaim, defense or cross complaint commenced, used or continued by a defendant is found, at any time during the proceedings or upon judgment, to be frivolous by the court, the court shall award to the successful party costs determined under s. 814.04 and reasonable attorney fees. (3) In order to find arf action, special proceeding, counterclaim, defense or cross complaint to be frivolous under sub. (1), the court must find one or more of the following: (b) The party or the party's attorney knew, or should have known, that the action, special proceeding, counterclaim, defense or cross complaint was without any reasonable basis in law or equity and could not be supported by a good faith argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“we use the term warranty to refer to the contract; however, as explained in section C. of this opinion, the contract is in reality a service contract and not a warranty. 2 According to Kotecki, such inspections are typical when the cost of the repair exceeds $1000, and since the cost of replacing the engine in this case was estimated as being between $15,000 and $16,000, such a request was not unexpected. 3 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2005-06 version unless otherwise noted. 4 15 U.S.C. § 2301 (3) reads: (3) The term”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.