Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2000 WI App 231 - State v. Wegner

2000 WI App 231 - State v. Wegner’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
September 2009
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 49 Wis. 2d 263 - McCleary v. State · 113 Wis. 2d 662 - State v. MacEmon · 202 Wis. 2d 620 - State v. Owen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]e will review the two sentencing proceedings on a global basis, treating the latter sentencing as a continuum of the first.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “mismanagement of judicial resources to require a court to go back to square one when sentencing after revocation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[l]ike the appellate court,... be able to rely upon the entire record, including the previous comments at the first sentencing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.